In the food and pharmaceutical industries, the fineness, purity and hygiene standards of raw material grinding directly affect product quality. Faced with different needs such as ultra-fine grinding, coarse grinding, medium and fine grinding, how to choose powder grinding machine?
As a leading company focusing on food and pharmaceutical grade grinding technology, Powder Mill Technology Co., Ltd has launched a selection guide for six core models to help companies accurately match production needs.

Applicable scenarios: Chinese medicine wall breaking, health food, and ultrafine processing of pharmaceutical raw materials.
Technical advantages: low-temperature airflow pulverization to avoid loss of heat-sensitive components. Ultrafine pulverizer meets GMP requirements..
Applicable scenarios: fine pulverization of milk powder, seasonings, and pharmaceutical excipients (such as lactose).
Technical highlights: The dust recovery rate of the pulse dust removal system is ≥99%, avoiding cross contamination, and made of 304 stainless steel.

Applicable scenarios: medium-fine processing (12-120 mesh) of food raw materials (such as sugar, grains), and Chinese medicinal materials (roots and stems).
Advantage comparison: more uniform fineness than traditional hammer pulverizer, the knife group can be quickly replaced, and it is suitable for a variety of materials.

Typical applications: freeze-dried fruit and vegetable blocks in the food industry, and primary crushing of raw materials in the pharmaceutical industry.
Upgrade plan: Add anti-jamming serrated blades to keep materials with a moisture content of ≤15% smooth.

Breakthrough areas: difficult-to-crush plant fibers (such as tea, dietary fiber), tough materials (such as collagen).
Innovative design: The fine impact mill can achieve a production of 3 tons/hour at a fineness of 99% <200 um, or 1 ton/hour at a fineness of 99% <100 um. .
Applicable scenarios: rapid crushing of food additives (such as citric acid) and dry medicinal materials.
User feedback: After food factory replaced the old model, energy consumption was reduced by 22% and production capacity increased by 35%.
